Landscape

Planting-in-Michigan

Project intern Joe Devota planting in a field in Michigan.
Photo by Research Assistant Rich Price

Agricultural fields and farms are naturally diverse, ranging from hilly to flat. One element of this project is quantifying the impact of variations of the landscape on cover crop performance and on cover crop contribution to corn growth and yield.

Previous work of our team members demonstrates that relationships between red clover cover crop and yield of a following corn crop differ substantially in different topographical positions. Data collected by our team in previous experiments indicated that 3-4 fold topography-driven differences in rye biomass can occur within a single year, while 2-3 fold variations have occurred among different years. After five years, these experiments will allow us to quantify the effects of year-to-year weather variation, topography and soil properties on rye cover crop performance.

Resources:

landscape variability handout
Speed Science: Landscape Scale Variability in Plant Performances: Preliminary Findings from Two Sites in Michigan Mel Erickson, graduate student at Michigan State University, talks about how topography affects plant growth. This presentation was made at this project's 2012 annual conference.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

We're scientists and farmers working together to create a suite of practices for corn-based systems that:

  • are resilient in times of drought
  • reduce soil and nutrient losses under saturated soil conditions
  • reduce farm field nitrogen losses
  • retain carbon in the soil
  • ensure crop and soil productivity

Sustainable Corn BLOG

Farmers and scientists in the Corn Belt discussing cover crops, weather, tillage, drainage water managment and much more.

 

Sustainable Corn YouTube Channel

SUSTAINABLECORN.ORG | Website Administrator
This material is based upon work that is supported by the National Institute of Food and
Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, under award number 2011-68002-30190
Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed on this website are those of the author(s)
and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture.